U.S. Senate Democrats press JPMorgan for details on debt collection practices By Reuters

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A sign outside JP Morgan Chase & Co. offices is seen in New York City, U.S., March 29, 2021. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo

By Pete Schroeder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Senior Democrats in the U.S. Senate are pressing JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:) for details on how they take overdue credit card borrowers to court.

In a letter sent to the bank on Monday, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown pressed for specifics on how the bank tries to collect on overdue credit card debt, and in particular if the bank uses “robo-signing” to quickly process legal documents without proper review.

“We request that Chase provide detailed information regarding the bank’s credit card debt collection practices. Chase should not utilize robo-signing in pursuing these debt collection suits, or any other debt,” wrote Brown, along with five other Senate Democrats.

While the bank has been fined by regulators for robo-signing in the past, a bank spokesman denied any claim the bank was doing so now, saying a trained employee reviews each affidavit the bank files individually to verify the information, which is then quality-checked by a second employee before it is filed.

“This is just false. There is nothing automated in the way these trained employees review the affidavits,” said Thomas Kelly, the bank spokesman.

“If ultimately we can’t reach a repayment plan, we pursue litigation as a last resort. We file litigation in less than 0.1% of all credit card accounts,” he added.

In 2015, the bank agreed https://www.reuters.com/article/us-jpmorgan-credit-debt-settlement/exclusive-jpmorgan-to-pay-over-125-million-to-settle-u-s-credit-card-debt-probes-idUSKCN0PI00520150708 to pay over $200 million in refunds and penalties after financial regulators found it relied on robo-signed documents, in which an employee signed an affidavit alleging facts to the court without personal knowledge of them.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said at the time the bank’s failure to systematically review its legal statements resulted in calculation errors in some lawsuits that resulted in judgments against borrowers for incorrect amounts.

The Democrats’ questions were prompted by a January story published by ProPublica and The Capitol Forum, which found JPMorgan was increasing the number of lawsuits filed against overdue credit card borrowers, after previously halting the practice in 2011.

Kelly said the bank resumed litigation in 2019, after informing regulators.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*