Landec Corporation (LNDC) Q1 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Landec Corporation (NASDAQ:LNDC) Q1 2023 Earnings Conference Call October 6, 2022 8:00 AM ET

Company Participants

Jeff Sonnek – Investor Relations, ICR

Jim Hall – Chief Executive Officer

John Morberg – Chief Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Jacob Johnson – Stephens

Mark Smith – Lake Street Capital Markets

Mike Petusky – Barrington Research

Mitch Pinheiro – Sturdivant & Company

Operator

Good morning and thank you for joining Landec’s Fiscal 2023 First Quarter Earnings Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. At that time, I will instructions on how to ask a question.

Now, I would like to turn the call over to Jeff Sonnek, Investor Relations at ICR. Thank you, please go ahead.

Jeff Sonnek

Good morning and thank you for joining us to discuss Landec Corporation’s first quarter fiscal 2023 earnings results. On the call today from the company are Jim Hall, Chief Executive Officer and President of Lifecore and John Morberg, Chief Financial Officer.

Before we begin today, you should have received a copy of our earnings release, which is also available on the company’s website, where we also post our investors presentation. In addition, we’d like to remind everyone of the Safe Harbor statement. Certain statements made in the course of this conference call contain forward-looking statements. It is important to note that the company’s actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements.

Additional information concerning risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained from time-to-time in the company’s filings with the SEC, including but not limited to, the company’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2022. Copies of these filings may be obtained from the company’s website.

And with that I’d like to turn the call over to Jim Hall, Chief Executive Officer.

Jim Hall

Thank you, Jeff. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I’ll begin today with a brief update on our strategic initiative that we unveiled just eight weeks ago to transform the focus of the company to a standalone Lifecore business. In terms of the formal timing of the transition to the Lifecore corporate branding and ticker switch, we are working through those legal processes and are targeting November for the formal change. When we have a greater precision, we will be sure to update the market accordingly, so everyone is prepared.

With respect to our efforts to monetize the remaining Curation Foods assets, those activities are well underway. However, we are not in a position yet to communicate any potential outcomes. That said, I want to continue to emphasize the importance of this work by our team and our commitment to getting this done as soon as possible.

With that, I’ll provide a summary of Lifecore’s fiscal ‘23 first quarter performance, provide some additional updates on our business and commercial efforts and then pass the call to John to discuss the financials in the fiscal ’23 outlook, which we are reiterating today. In the fiscal ’23 first quarter, Lifecore grew revenue by 8% to $23.7 million, generating an increase of 8.1% in adjusted EBITDA to $2.5 million both of which were consistent with our plan and the cadence that we disclosed at the beginning of the fiscal year.

As a reminder, the first quarter is our seasonally lowest quarter of the year in terms of revenues and EBITDA, due to the idling of our manufacturing lines for annual required clean room certification and facility maintenance. Nonetheless, we’re off to a solid start for the year and remain excited about the business development activity that we are generating, which I’ll cover in a moment.

Our business remains very well positioned as a fully integrated CDMO with highly differentiated capabilities for the development, fill and finish of complex sterile injectable grade pharmaceutical products. These technical capabilities have been honed from our more than 40-years of experience in building a premier pharmaceutical injectable grade, Hyaluronic Acid manufacturing platform with a focus on complex and highly regulated products. Our unique expertise coupled with the ongoing industry trends towards outsourcing of new drug development means Lifecore is ideally positioned as a preferred partner to provide CDMO services for new injectable drug applications.

In fact Lifecore is the only manufacturer of pharmaceutical injectable grade HA with injectable CDMO expertise in the market today. Approximately 55% of all new drug applications are injectables and prefilled syringe demand is growing at an estimated 13% compound annual rate. Given the industry’s limited injectable drug manufacturing capacity, we will continue to take full advantage of this incredible opportunity and deliver much needed capacity that we’ve been investing in during the past few years.

On the development front, our project portfolio remains robust with 24 active projects from 21 different customers. These 24 projects are dispersed across various stages of our portfolio as follows: early phase clinical development with five projects; Phase 1 and 2 clinical development with 11 projects; and Phase 3 clinical development and scale up commercial validation activity with eight projects. We continue to work closely with all of our customers in progressing their products through the various stages of development and eventual FDA approval. These efforts are now paying off. Three of the late phase projects are nearing FDA approval, one is a drug with a PDUFA date before the end of calendar 2022 and the other two are medical device programs, both of which have anticipated approvals within this calendar year.

As I mentioned last quarter, we are preparing for pre-approval inspections to support these projects and are working closely with these customers to support their product launch plans. As it pertains to the forecasted value of the projects in our active portfolio, we currently believe the revenue potential from the development activity is in the range of $50 million to $80 million in development revenue over the life cycle of the projects, which we expect will continue to grow as we expand our active development project portfolio.

Looking at the potential commercial value for the eight late stage projects in our active portfolio, we believe that the commercial revenue opportunity is in the range of $45 million to $120 million annually as these products received FDA approval and are successfully transferred to contracted commercial supply agreements. CDMO activities represented nearly 80% of our revenue mix this past fiscal year 2022. With the balance of our revenue generated from HA raw material sales. HA remains a critical component of our business and is the foundation by which we’ve developed our CDMO expertise in complex and highly viscous products over the past 40-years.

Approximately 50% of the revenue produced in our CDMO business is generated from products utilizing HA and within our current active project portfolio that mix is approximately 70%. HA is viewed as an ideal excipient for injectable therapies and that it is a naturally occurring substance in the human body and it’s highly vistas characteristics allow for optimized targeted drug development. Thus, we continue to see a meaningful activity among the biopharma community and utilizing HA and nearly 40% of our prospective project opportunities are utilizing HA, which is a good segue to updating you on our commercial strategy to convert new potential engagements.

We now have the complete team in place that we set out to establish from our investments and people that we announced last year. Our team is doing an impressive job ramping up our commercial presence in the market and we are seeing immediate returns on our investment in people, which spans marketing, sales, business operations and process development.

In the fiscal first quarter, we added 14 new prospective opportunities to our development opportunity funnel for a total of 63 projects that are in various stages of diligence and discussion. These opportunities span multiple end markets, classes of drugs and medical devices and with an assortment of companies both large and small, which we believe speaks to the attractive CDMO capabilities within Lifecore’s growing expertise that the pharma industry is actively seeking in a CDMO partner. While the number of potential projects will shift over time as we convert some and dismiss others, we aren’t seeing any slowdown in the number of opportunities. On the contrary, we continue to believe that our expanded commercial strategy will support an increasing trend well into the future.

On the operational front, our company continues to prepare for a multi-year acceleration of growth. As I mentioned, it is imperative that we continue to push our organization forward with the implementation of best practices and new capabilities. Our team is in place and they are diligently working to raise our profile. We’ve bolstered our marketing approach which is supported by enhanced branding, awareness and greater reach to communicate Lifecore’s differentiated capability to the market.

Last fiscal year, we made great advancements in optimizing our facilities in anticipation of adding new capacity in the coming years. With this complete, we are now focused on creating operational efficiencies across the entire company. We are modernizing systems and automating wherever possible. For instance, our Laboratory Information Management System or LIMS has been integrated and we’ve qualified our first product on LIMS in late June with a series of other products transitioning the LIMS in the coming months. This platform provides rapid visibility to data and enhance analytics that replaces manual and in inefficient processes.

We are also isolating additional areas of savings and efficiency through our focus on pharmaceutical elegance. These opportunities include enhancing our sustainability and energy management, our supply chain and working capital requirements. Further, our team is laser focused on resource planning across our entire organization to prepare us to add new manufacturing lines and shifts and to do so with an efficient workforce as capacity and demand requires. In fact, we just recently added an additional weekend shift to support increased manufacturing activity across our organization. While there’s always more to do, Lifecore is very well prepared for anticipated robust growth.

Looking ahead, our future expansion continues to be driven by our strong development project portfolio, expansion of our prospective development pipeline, and conversion of these projects into our active development portfolio. We remain focused on driving towards a multi-year acceleration of annual revenue growth into the mid to high teens based upon our current project portfolio characteristics and favorable industry tailwinds. While we continue to concentrate on maximizing the revenue generating capacity of our current infrastructure, we also must balance the known future capacity requirements within our project portfolio with the multi-year lead times on the specialized equipment that is manufactured to our specifications and must also undergo rigorous testing, customer acceptance and regulatory approval.

Our four decades of experience in creating a world-class quality management system provides us the confidence to directly meet these challenges as we plan to deliver this multi-year acceleration and our revenue growth trajectory, which is supported by known projects within our existing project portfolio and will be further enhanced by new opportunities with the prospective projects in our development pipeline.

Now, I would like to turn the call to John for his financial review.

John Morberg

Thank you, Jim. I’ll start with a review of Lifecore’s financial performance and our fiscal ’23 outlook before shifting to some updates around the financial aspects of the transition plan that we shared in August.

As a reminder, our first quarter is our seasonally lowest quarter in terms of revenues. This seasonality results from idling our manufacturing lines for annual, required clean room certification and facility maintenance. This slows shipment volumes and causes first quarter to be our lightest quarter of the year.

For the first quarter of fiscal ‘23, Lifecore total revenues increased 8% to $23.7 million consistent with our expectation for the first quarter growth to be in the single-digit range. This growth was driven by a 31% increase in our HA raw material manufacturing business and a 3% increase in our CDMO business. The increase in the HA business is primarily due to reduced shipments in the prior year period, due to excess channel inventory during the global pandemic and its impact on elective procedures.

Lifecore gross profit increased 6% to $6.1 million for the first quarter of ‘23, representing a gross margin of 25.7%, which compares to 26.3% in the prior year period. The 60 basis point variance versus prior year was primarily due to higher depreciation, partially offset by improved revenue mix. Lifecore adjusted EBITDA increased 8.1% to $2.5 million for the first quarter of ’23 with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 10.4%, which was consistent with the prior year.

Shifting to our fiscal ’23 outlook for our Lifecore segment, we are reiterating revenue guidance in the range of $122 million to $126 million, which implies growth in the range of 12% to 15% and adjusted EBITDA guidance in the range of $31 million to $32.5 million, which implies growth in the range of 7% to 12%.

While we are no longer providing formal guidance on our Curation Foods segment, due to our strategic actions to monetize those remaining assets. For modeling purposes, we are assuming no contribution from Curation Foods for the full fiscal year. Additionally, we are reiterating our full-year guidance for our other segment, which reflects the ongoing corporate costs of the organization, which we continue to expect in the range of $7 million to $7.5 million.

On this point, I’d remind everyone that while our intent is to formally transition to Lifecore, our organization is in the process of establishing the corporate infrastructure that we carry at Landec. As this transition progresses, we will be making those changes. But in the near-term, we think it’s most appropriate to expect those expenses to continue. Longer term, we believe there will be some modest savings as we manage the smaller and less complex Lifecore organization.

So on a consolidated basis, we expect adjusted EBITDA net of corporate costs in assuming no contribution from Curation Foods to be in the range of $23.5 million to $25.5 million for the full-year fiscal ’23. With respect to Lifecore, there are a few modeling considerations of note. We continue to anticipate gross margins to decline by approximately 100 basis points in fiscal ’23 to approximately 39%, which is very consistent with fiscal year ‘20 and fiscal year ‘21 performance. This is due to an expected mix shift towards higher commercial revenues, which on a relative basis have lower margins than our other revenue streams.

Additionally, we will continue to invest in the sales and marketing functions as we drive an acceleration of top line growth taking advantage of the favorable industry tailwinds. As a result, we anticipate a similar to slightly higher level of operating expenses versus prior year, perhaps by approximately 50 basis points as a percentage of revenues for the full-year.

In terms of Lifecore’s quarterly cadence, we continue to expect sequential revenue growth from first to second quarter and second to third quarter and then similar revenue in both third and fourth quarters. And as a reminder, third quarter of fiscal ’22 revenues were higher-than-expected, due to shipment timing. Therefore, we would expect this year’s third quarter to be approximately flat with the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to increase sequentially from the first — through the third quarters, but then flatten out in fiscal fourth quarter, which is expected to be similar in size to that of the third quarter.

Now turning to Landec’s balance sheet, which still reflects our remaining Curation Foods assets and liabilities and the impact of the segment’s cash flows. Net bank debt on a reported basis for the fiscal quarter ended August 28, ’22 was $138.3 million, which was essentially flat with the net bank debt at the end of fiscal ’22 of $136.5 million. In fiscal ’23 first quarter, Lifecore spent $2.9 million in capital expenditures, which is consistent with our fiscal year ’23 CapEx guidance of $34 million to $38 million, which is earmarked for two multi use isolator fillers in the associated formulation and process support equipment, which will be ready for acceptance testing next summer.

As a reminder included in this estimate is approximately $3.4 million of CapEx carryover from fiscal ’22. This keeps us on track to expand our operational filling capacity from our current 10 million units to 22 million units and beyond to meet expected growth in capacity demand, driven by projected growth in our base commercial business and commercialization of products in the late phases of development in our active project portfolio.

And with that, operator, please open the call for questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

Thank you. The floor is now open for questions. [Operator Instructions] First question is coming from Jacob Johnson of Stephens. Please go ahead.

Jacob Johnson

Hey, good morning Jim and John. Congrats to the nice start to the year at Lifecore. Maybe kicking off with a higher level question. Jim, you talked a little bit about the state of the fill finish market, but maybe just to flush it out some more. Can you just talk about kind of where fill finish supply and demand is for the industry? It sounds like capacity is still tight there? And then just a follow-up there, maybe just a couple of comments on how you differentiate yourself versus other fill finish providers?

Jim Hall

Sure. Good morning, Jacob. Listen based on the activity that we see coming in from the field and what we’re hearing from our salespeople on the streets. I think you can see there’s no end in the opportunities that are coming our way. We increased our opportunities that we’re evaluating by 14 projects and I know there’s more knocking on the door. And I think a lot of that is based on our ability to provide capacity. People know that we have additional capacity coming on board over the next couple of years, which also says there isn’t a lot of unused capacity out there. And people are looking for it, right? That’s part of it.

And the other part is the niche that we provide in the complex formulations of products and the fact that Lifecore has the HA manufacturing capability and the importance of that HA to our business that I discussed during the — earlier in the call also plays into it, because a big chunk of what’s coming our way contains HA and which is answers part of your question on the differentiation of Lifecore. So you hear people talking about reduced funding in biotech projects. I think that’s probably true. I think in our experience though, what’s not getting funded is earlier phase projects that would probably wouldn’t be funded in a typical situation except that there was a lot of funding available out there.

So we’re not seeing a slowdown far from it. We still see the limited capacity out there that’s helping drive the additional opportunities for Lifecore and listen the work we’ve done to put the organization in place from a targeted marketing and sales approach is really starting to pay off. And now the focus is on converting those opportunities into active projects to continue to drive things moving forward.

Jacob Johnson

Got it. Thanks for that Jim. And that segues to my next question. You’ve got this, kind of, funnel of 63 projects and people you’re talking to there. And can you just talk about how selective you are in terms of who you work with and that kind of decision making process as you take those leads and then, kind of, convert them into the development pipeline?

Jim Hall

Yes, sure. Listen, Lifecore has got a very experienced and amazing team that’s got a lot of industry experience and really has a lot of experience and works hard to evaluate and identify low probability projects and tries to eliminate those sooner rather than later. And really, it’s one of our core competencies that’s been driven by your 40-years of experience trying to identify what we should and shouldn’t work with and what really spark that is historically Lifecore didn’t have a lot of capacity and we wanted to make sure we picked the right projects that had a high probability of success to get there. So that’s really what we bank on as we pick and work through the ideas to get through the funnel.

The other thing is we’re spending a lot of time on our new marketing effort getting Lifecore’s unique capabilities out to the marketplace. For the first time ever, we’ve upgraded our website, doing Google Ads, updating our social media content and enhancing our trade show presence, but really what’s more important is we’re paying attention to what that’s telling us and where we need to go target to get more opportunities into the pipeline. So there’s still more work to do there. The opportunities are showing up. Now it’s a matter of getting them onboarded as quickly as possible, and that’s what we’re doing now with the organization to make sure we’re set up and can get these things onboarded, because several are out for a proposal and it’s just a matter of working it through the process.

Jacob Johnson

Got it. And then just last one for me. Jim, you mentioned I think some, kind of, operational initiatives. And I think last quarter you talked a little bit about Lifecore University and I think a bunch of lean and Six Sigma people have been, kind of, educated on those. Can you just talk about the key areas for operational improvements? And then if John wants to chime in on how we should think about that from a financial perspective, that’d be great too.

Jim Hall

Yes, sure. Jacob, it’s actually across the entire organization and impacts every corner of the company, right? Obviously, we want to optimize and get the most out of our processes as we can. So we look for efficiencies and there’s a lot of lean projects centered around that, as well as our business operations processing to help get things identified and onboarded and making sure that the organization is set up not only from a project management and business ops staff point, but from a development and manufacturing standpoint to support the increased manufacturing capacity.

So LIMS is another example, our Laboratory Information Management System to allow us to manage data and look at it quicker and get it out to our partners quicker as well. And so it’s across the entire organization and something that is ingrained in our culture at Lifecore. And one of the reasons that we implemented what we call Lifecore University is to get people onboarded, our employees onboarded and operational as quickly as possible. John, anything you want to add?

John Morberg

Hey, Jacob from a financial perspective really impacts two areas or gross profit margins and operating leverage and operating expenses. And so all these things that Jim’s talking about are we want to be able to keep our gross profit margin in that high 30s to low 40s. And then secondly, over time, leverage the operating expense to drive EBITDA margin. So that’s where we’re very focused on these efforts.

Jacob Johnson

Got it. Thanks for that John and Jim. Thanks for taking the questions.

Jim Hall

Thanks, Jacob.

John Morberg

Thanks, Jacob.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] The next question is coming from Mark Smith of Lake Street Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Mark Smith

Hi, guys. Just wanted to look at the pipeline just a little bit more. Can you just talk about, kind of, conversion from prospects into projects, kind of, generally how you feel about your pipeline, and then really that conversion process?

Jim Hall

Sure. Good morning, Mark. Obviously, we have a lot of things in the pipeline that we’re analyzing 63 that we’re in discussion with now. And the way we look at those is how they run through the funnel is what converts to leads and then we monitor qualified leads and then they get to the proposal stage and not all of them are going to make it into that process. We have a lot of experience and a pretty good set of criteria we look at to gauge opportunities before we would even consider them part of that funnel or part of the 63 projects. So I don’t have a set percentage of how many of those will be onboarded over the next period of time. A lot of it depends on what phase they’re in and how it fits into our niche of capabilities. But our track record in historical rate is pretty high.

Will that continue as more come through? It’s our intent to have as many of those come through as we can, but it’s difficult to judge how many of those. The one thing I can tell you is the majority of those 63 fit what we look for. Now it’s just going to be picking the best ones that utilize our skill set and we can provide the most value to.

Mark Smith

Okay. And then a couple, kind of, model questions maybe for John. Just cadence of the revenue guidance, it sounds like you guys are looking for a really solid growth here in Q2 with some of that just a function of seasonality and then just how well Q3 was? How solid Q3 was last year that really drives that higher year-over-year growth here in Q2?

John Morberg

Yes. Mark, I think we’re really seeing as the back half of the year is probably where the biggest growth is going to be occurring. And again, it’s just kind of the lineup of projects that are out there and timing of orders from customers. So we actually see a bigger growth in the back half of the year. And not dissimilar than last year actually as well.

Mark Smith

Okay. And then similarly just as we think about CapEx, very little spend here in Q1, these projects that are coming online, what’s kind of the cadence or expected timing of this larger spend in CapEx this year?

Jim Hall

Yes. I’ll start and I’ll ask John to weigh in a little bit as well. But listen, Lifecore works very hard to be good stewards of our capital. This is a timing and within what we expected Q1 will be and really focuses on progress payments for a lot of the capacity related spend we have. It’s obviously going to pick up through the rest of the year. We’re still maintaining the spend guidance that we gave earlier. And so nothing really to call out here other than this is the timing. Q1 was light as we projected and Lifecore is going to do whatever it can to manage the spend and not spend until we need to.

John Morberg

Yes, the only thing else to add to that is that most of our CapEx are 85% of it is growth related and primarily focused on the filler isolator equipment and which we hope to arrive next summer. And so as a result, it just kind of pushes a lot of the progress payments later into the year or the back half of the year.

Mark Smith

Okay, great. Thank you, guys.

Jim Hall

Thanks, Mark.

Operator

Thank you. The next question is coming from Mike Petusky of Barrington Research. Please go ahead.

Mike Petusky

Hey, good morning. So that actually was a perfect lead into the question I wanted to ask. One of the questions, I guess, most about Landec is CapEx in terms of, sort of, the longer term normalized CapEx. Can you guys — you sort of alluded to a lot of the current year spending growth capital. Could you just speak to what’s a normalized figure or normalized range after you, sort of, get through what I think is a period of elevated investment?

Jim Hall

Yes, John, you want to take that?

John Morberg

Yes. Hey, Mike. Good morning. How are you?

Mike Petusky

Hey, good.

John Morberg

I think as we’ve shared a few times, we’ve had our CapEx needs or could be somewhat lumpy and not necessarily perfectly linear. But we certainly are looking at our capacity needs and we need to place orders for filling equipment a couple of years it takes to get it here and then you’ve got time to get it validated before it starts really earning some revenue. And so that’s a big part of the — of what we look at from a CapEx perspective.

But primarily, I would say that our CapEx is going to be growth focus, so we should be 85% plus of our CapEx spend is always going to be focused on that and not focused on maintenance CapEx. So the other part is, as you can see that we’re transitioning to really a growth company. And so we intend to really at least the next couple of years is to reinvest our EBITDA at Lifecore back into CapEx, because we’re really focused in on is growing our EBITDA out into the future.

And we think with these investments, the annual increase in EBITDA is very worthwhile. We think this $34 million to $38 million for instance, how to build and generate an additional $5 million to $10 million of EBITDA on an annual basis. And as a result, that turns into a very nice ROI, when you look at valuation multiples in the CDMO space.

Mike Petusky

So is it then fair to say that maybe this really isn’t an elevated range going forward, maybe this is more like a normal range going forward?

Jim Hall

Yes. Just — we just not positioned yet today to probably give guidance on that other than what we’ve given guidance on for this year. But again, I would think that we would be trying to reinvest for the most part our EBITDA back into CapEx going forward. By the way, once you get through a couple of years of that, eventually turn around to a pretty nice free cash flow in business. But in the short-term here, the focus is on being a growth company.

Mike Petusky

And I know you don’t want to comment a lot about the duration assets. But is there an expectation that, sort of, that process of monetization will be complete either by calendar year end or fiscal year end? I mean, can you sort of speak to that?

Jim Hall

Yes, sure. So the first thing is we said obviously we’re in a process to sell those off and when we say that by virtue of being in the process, we’ve hired the appropriate advisers to help represent our interests, and they’re very much underway. We’ve kind of created our own Jim and I, our own self imposed goal of a sale by year-end. What I hope you take away from that though is that we’re really committed to making something happen, but we’re also realistic as the amount of time things like this take. We’ve — we do appreciate our shareholders, who would like to see this done quickly and we’re aligned with that completely. But we’ve been working through projects with really in a midst of unprecedented circumstances between the pandemic, extreme inflation, labor shortages. And all those variables really complicate this exercise already, which we’ve done each time for each asset that we’ve had to sell.

So I will say we are focused on it. We work on it every day and we know this is important for this company and we intend to get it done as quickly as we can and we’ll update obviously the market as soon as we are able to.

Mike Petusky

Okay. Alright, great. And I just wanted to confirm that I heard one thing. I think that Jim said earlier, PDUFA date before the end of the year and two devices likely approved before the end of the calendar year, correct?

Jim Hall

That’s correct, Mike.

Mike Petusky

Awesome. Thanks guys. Really appreciate it.

Jim Hall

Thanks, Mike. Talk soon.

Operator

Thank you. Our final question today is going to be coming from Mitch Pinheiro of Sturdivant & Company. Please go ahead.

Mitch Pinheiro

Yes, hi. Good morning.

Jim Hall

Good morning, Mitch.

John Morberg

Good morning.

Mitch Pinheiro

Hey, one thing I want to understand that you talk about tight capacity in the syringe fill finish area in the industry. But our isn’t that capacity kind of constrained that company to company where new drugs, new therapies or the manufacturer is sort of already embedded into that process at the beginning? So I’m not sure why there’s a lack of capacity that you can take advantage of in any immediate sense. Wouldn’t you have to go through the whole FDA process again that get approved into that new therapy? Could you talk about that a little bit?

Jim Hall

Yes, Mitch, I think where you’re a little bit confused is and I’ll clarify your last part of your question. If somebody is going to transition from an already approved CDMO to another one, that would require the qualification of the approval, the whole process again. What we’re finding, there’s a lot of drug development going on and the majority of that is being outsourced. And what we’re seeing is people trying to identify CDMOs that have capacity that can build with them in the future. So they have a product platform, several products, they project what kind of capacity they’re going to need for the next two, three, four, five years and try to lock that up with somebody that’s got the ability to grow with them. And that is part of the qualification process for in a drug would be an NDA where Lifecore in this case would be qualified as they develop the product and process. But a lot of the things in our pipeline or companies looking for that capacity and who has capacity available and to lock that up for what they see as their future demand.

Mitch Pinheiro

And you talk about your own capacity as you expand it, so that capacity that you are building over the next couple of years here, I had thought it was mostly earmarked to people, to companies that you’re already connected with. So are you — is that A, is that true? And B, if not, are you — I mean, we’re going to see a ramp up in CapEx to further expand your theoretical capacity?

Jim Hall

Right. You’re right that we have a good chunk of that capacity earmarked, with things we’re already working on. We also know and have — and are planning additional capacity above and beyond what we think we’re going to need, because in this — in the world of injectable grade CDMO you need capacity to continue to grow and expand. And that’s what we’re planning on. So not all of the capacity we’re planning is taken up. We’re trying to sell additional capacity. And at some point, down the road, Lifecore will need to expand beyond the two additional fill lines. We’ve talked about that, we’re constantly evaluating what, kind of, capacity we think will need to support that pipeline. And I’ll make sure the investment aligns when the time is right to make sure we have that capacity moving forward.

I wouldn’t say there’s going to be a ramp up in capital spend, I think we just need to evaluate when we need it, like we’ve talked about Mitch, you know, it’s a three-plus year timeline to get a fill line in place now. And so the art of this is determining what, kind of, capacity you need in making that investment early enough. The other thing we’re seeing like I just mentioned with — from our people out in the field is there are people looking for future capacity and willing to help invest in that and that’s something we’re looking at as well.

Mitch Pinheiro

Yes. I mean, you know, it must be difficult to, I mean, to sort of figure out your capacity needs as most of those 24 projects in your pipeline just by definition of drug approval, most of those will fail. So how to know what your capacity is, your need — capacity needs will be, against the prospects of successful drug development, I mean, it seems to be quite a challenge.

Jim Hall

It is a challenge, and you’re right, not everything will make it through. That’s why we — once things make it into the late phase and we start to see some successful data coming out of Phase 3 trials. We have a little more assurance that it typically is not a matter of if, but matter of when an approval will happen, not everything will make it through even though it’s in its Phase 3 trial. But the other thing is not everything and that’s why we pay attention to the late Phase and the eight projects that are really driving the next three to four years of commercial capacity requirement.

The other game and thing we need to model and we pay a lot of attention to is how much clinical capacity we’ll need to support that portfolio as it moves forward qualification batches, validation batches, that kind of thing. So it’s not all a commercial volume puzzle, and listen our team does a phenomenal job working through this and understanding and working with our partners of what is expected as they move through and as we move to the commercial contract that we have, what we need in place to support them.

Mitch Pinheiro

Okay. One more question. And it just concerns leverage, so you know, you kind of — you’re a growth company, but a growth company with high leverage, you know, is obviously less attractive than perhaps the alternative. And, you know, we’re here at 5 times leverage. I know that there’s going to be some asset sales down the road. But as you come out of that, I mean, that the asset sales sort of have to play into your capital spending plans for Lifecore. I mean, you don’t want to emerge as Lifecore biomedical with a highly leveraged balance sheet, because you can’t get the asset sale pricing that you want. So where — how do you think about that? Are you confident that you can — that your asset sales will be enough to keep yourself at a — whatever you deem as reasonable leverage? Or is that — does that slowdown your capital spending plans? Can you talk about that a little bit?

Jim Hall

Yes. Obviously, improving our capital structure, it’s been a common threat behind project swift and since we introduced it a couple of years ago, it’s no secret that it’s unsustainable, the leverage level that we have and hence the hard work to preserve cash, optimize our assets and extract value. And as you’ve seen, we’ve directly redeployed that cash towards debt retirement and we’ve been consistent in our intent to improve the balance sheet. While I’m not in a position to provide you a forecast of what stand alone leverage will be, suffice it to say, we want to improve it going forward. And we’re going to do it in two ways, continuing to sell off assets to improve the balance sheet with our EBITDA growth will also really help to delever the business.

And we are constantly in great communication with our banks, always looking for what’s the next bank deal we could do going forward once we’re a standalone Lifecore business. So we still believe that there is a great way forward for us to make this — make our growth plans work.

Mitch Pinheiro

I know — as you look forward, I mean, is there a leverage target that you think Lifecore biomedical can operate comfortably? Is it 3 times? Is it 2 times? Any idea?

Jim Hall

Yes, I mean, my personal sense is I’d love to be in the three times range and we recognize for a short period of time we might have to be above that. But ultimately, we think we can be more comfortably in that type of range. We look, kind of, mid range time frames.

Mitch Pinheiro

Okay. All right, very helpful. Thank you, guys.

Jim Hall

Thanks, Mitch.

John Morberg

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. At this time, I’d like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Hall for any additional or closing comments.

Jim Hall

Thanks again everyone for your interest. These are very exciting times for Lifecore. We’ll look forward to talking with you again when we release our fiscal second quarter results. So thank you and have a good day.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This concludes today’s event. You may disconnect your lines or log off the webcast at this time and enjoy the rest of your day.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*