Guild Holdings Company (NYSE:GHLD) Q2 2022 Earnings Conference Call August 4, 2022 6:00 PM ET
Company Participants
Michael Kim – Investor Relations
Mary Ann McGarry – Chief Executive Officer
Terry Schmidt – President
Amber Kramer – Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Don Fandetti – Wells Fargo
Rick Shane – JPMorgan
Trevor Cranston – JMP Securities
Operator
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Guild Holdings Company Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session with instructions to follow at that time. As a reminder, this call is being recorded.
And I would now like to turn the conference over to Michael Kim of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Michael.
Michael Kim
Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. Before we begin, I’d like to remind everyone that comments on this conference call may contain certain forward-looking statements regarding the company’s expected operating and financial performance for future periods and industry trends. These statements are based on the company’s current expectations. Actual results for future periods may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements due to a number of risks or other factors that are described in greater detail under the section titled, Risk Factors in Guild’s Form 10-K and 10-Q and in other reports filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
Additionally, today’s remarks will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release filed today with the SEC and are also available on Guild’s Investor Relations website.
Participating in the call today are Chief Executive Officer, Mary Ann McGarry; President, Terry Schmidt; and Chief Financial Officer, Amber Kramer.
Now I’d like to turn the call over to Mary Ann McGarry. Mary Ann?
Mary Ann McGarry
Thank you, Michael. Good afternoon, everyone and thank you for joining us. As always, I’m joined by our President, Terry Schmidt; and our Chief Financial Officer, Amber Kramer. Our Chief Operating Officer, David Neylan will join us for Q&A after our prepared remarks.
Despite higher interest rates, excess capacity and limited inventories, I am pleased we were once again able to deliver solid financial results for the second quarter of 2022. Adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share came in at $14 million and $0.23 per share respectively for the second quarter of this year, compared to $32 million and $0.53 per share for the prior quarter. Much of the sequential declines in revenue and income can be tied to lower origination volumes and margins consistent with broader industry trends.
From our perspective, as cycles turn near-term challenges present longer-term opportunities. And our tenured management team maintains a proven track record of generating consistent financial performance over market cycles. We believe our differentiated purchase-focused business model positions us well going forward as refinancing volumes continue to fade. In the second quarter, purchase loans accounted for 84% of our total origination volume compared to 66% in the prior quarter and an estimated 70% for the mortgage industry according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
We remain focused on product development to stay in front of shifting market trends. Last quarter, we discussed our new GreenSmart Advantage product in partnership with The Home Depot. The program is designed to help homebuyers save on utility costs and manage multiple payments by bundling the cost of new energy-efficient appliances into mortgage loans. This quarter, we introduced CashPass, a new program to help homebuyers compete with all cash offers in today’s competitive housing market. Guild’s CashPass program allows homebuyers to write a cash offer and be more competitive against other all-cash bids or multiple offers.
In July, we introduced Complete Rate, a new program that provides a more inclusive path to homeownership based on residual income analysis and rent payment history, an alternative to the traditional FICO credit score. As indicated by our operating history during many market cycles, we rightsized the business to align costs with volume trends while capitalizing on market dislocation. Through the first half of this year, we realized approximately $40 million of cost savings primarily through head count reductions on an annualized basis. And we will continue to manage the business as market dynamics evolve.
Our strong and liquid balance sheet remains a key differentiating factor. We maintain favorable leverage ratios and healthy liquidity levels to fund growth despite market conditions. Pursuant to our share repurchase program, we recently returned excess capital to shareholders by repurchasing approximately 142,000 shares in May and June at an average stock price of $10.18 per share. We believe we remain well positioned to capitalize on M&A opportunities. The mortgage industry remains highly fragmented. And we believe smaller firms are finding it increasingly difficult to maintain profitability in the face of lower revenue, shifting competitive dynamics and overcapacity.
Broader market constructions are driving a flight to quality with individual sales people and teams as well as companies increasingly attracted to Guild’s differentiated purchase-focused business model along with our successful acquisition track record. In addition to our ongoing organic recruiting efforts, which are tracking ahead of expectations we are increasingly benefiting from a flight to stability.
The number of inbound calls we are receiving from individual loan officers and teams continues to trend higher, especially as competitors exit the business. While it will take time for incoming loan officers to build volume, we see the current market as presenting opportunities to add talent as we continue to generate profitable growth across market cycles. I am confident in our growth prospects as we increasingly leverage our existing capabilities and balance sheet as well as broadening the platform.
So with that I’d like to turn it over to our President Terry Schmidt. Terry?
Terry Schmidt
Thanks, Mary Ann. As I’ve discussed on prior calls, our scale-enabled servicing business acts as a natural hedge to our origination segment during periods of rising interest rates and is an increasingly important growth driver for revenue and cash flow. Focusing on the second quarter, we booked $47 million of favorable valuation adjustments of MSRs compared to $209 million in the prior quarter. It’s important to understand these adjustments are non-cash in nature though higher rates typically drive slower prepayments and longer holding periods, thereby extending recurring cash flows over time.
The unpaid principal balance of our servicing portfolio consisting primarily of MSRs sourced through our retail channel was up 4% quarter-over-quarter to $75.9 billion, driving growth in related servicing fees. The strength of our scale-driven servicing platform along with our focus on customer service and relationships not only supports our client retention rates but also supports growth in the servicing channel’s contribution to net operating income and positive cash flow.
We retained servicing rights for 89% of total loans sold in the second quarter of 2022 with strong retrenching driving ongoing growth in UPB levels and related fees. In addition, our servicing platform along with our focus on customer service supports strong recapture rates. For the second quarter of 2022 our purchase recapture rate was 28.7%.
Turning to gain on sale margins, I wanted to touch on some of the moving parts in the second quarter. As Amber will discuss in greater detail next, our gain on sale margins on pull-through adjusted lock volume was 357 basis points for the second quarter compared to 334 basis points in the first quarter.
Looking ahead, we expect gain on sale margins to stabilize in the second half of this year assuming excess capacity continues to contract thereby driving more favorable pricing dynamics over time. Having said that, a sustainable step-up in gain on sale margins will be dependent upon market rate and spread trends as well as broader inventory levels.
I’ll now turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Amber Kramer to discuss the financials in more detail. Amber?
Amber Kramer
Thank you, Terry. As is our standard practice, my comments will focus on sequential quarter comparisons. For the second quarter of 2022, we generated $5.7 billion of total in-house loan originations, compared to $6.1 billion in the first quarter. Net revenue totaled $288 million, compared to $482 million in the prior quarter, while net income totaled $58 million or $0.95 per diluted share. Adjusted net income totaled $14 million or $0.23 per share while adjusted EBITDA totaled $22 million for the second quarter.
Turning to non-GAAP results. Adjusted figures for the second quarter excluded a $46.9 million favorable change in fair value of MSRs, compared to a $209.5 million markup in the prior quarter with the differential largely attributable to an evolving rate backdrop. In addition, we booked a $16.5 million change in fair value of contingent liabilities due to acquisitions, which was reflected as a benefit to G&A expense compared to $28.9 million in the first quarter of 2022.
Focusing on our origination segment. Our gain on sale margin came in at 363 basis points on $5.7 billion of total funded originations for the second quarter, down from 400 basis points on $6.1 billion of funded originations in the first quarter. Our gain on sale margin on pull-through adjusted locked volume was 357 basis points compared to 334 basis points in the prior quarter. Pull-through adjusted locked volume totaled $5.8 billion in the second quarter compared to $7.3 billion in the prior quarter, primarily reflecting a more challenging macro backdrop.
For our servicing segment, we generated $64 million of net income in the second quarter versus $227 million in the prior quarter with the quarter-over-quarter decline, mostly a function of less favorable MSR valuation adjustments. That was partially offset by higher servicing fees on continued growth in unpaid principal balances.
At a high level, we maintain a variable cost base, which we believe we can optimize as market conditions dictate. As Mary Ann mentioned, we have realized approximately $40 million of annualized expense savings through the first half of the year, which is primarily a result of staff reductions and their associated total compensation. Importantly, we maintain the flexibility to continue to invest for growth and implement further cost savings as needed.
Looking ahead, expense levels in the second half of the year will be partially dependent on volume trends. And we will provide updates on our progress, if appropriate, as we move forward. Our balance sheet remains strong and our assets consist primarily of high-quality loans and MSRs.
Turning to liquidity. As of June 30, cash and cash equivalents, excluding funds to pay down, our warehouse lines totaled $249 million, while warehouse lines of credit totaled $2.7 billion with unused capacity of $1.6 billion. Our leverage ratio, which we define as total debt including funding divided by tangible stockholders’ equity, was 1.3 times as of June 30, 2022 compared to 1.4 times at March 31, 2022 and 3.1 times as of December 31, 2021.
We continue to focus on the best way to deploy capital while managing through uncertain times with financial prudency. Our strong balance sheet and liquidity enables us to invest in the business and strategically deploy capital in a disciplined manner to drive growth and shareholder value over time.
As Mary Ann mentioned earlier, from early May to the end of June, we repurchased approximately 142,000 shares at an average stock price of $10.18 per share. Book value per share was $19.49 as of the end of the second quarter while we grew tangible book value per share by 7% on a sequential basis to $16.04.
In addition, our capital position and differentiated business model facilitate capitalizing on strategic M&A opportunities that complement our organic growth should they arise as we have done successfully throughout our firm’s history. We generated $1.5 billion of loan originations and $1.5 billion of pull-through adjusted loss volume in July.
Given the months just ended, we are still in the process of finalizing our gain on sale margin calculation for July at the moment. As Terry mentioned, we forecast margins to stabilize in the second half of the year, assuming supply and demand imbalances normalize though it will take time for more favorable market dynamics to flow through gain on sale revenue.
And with that, we’ll open the call up for questions. Operator?
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Don Fandetti with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.
Don Fandetti
Yes. Can you talk a little bit about your gain on sale expectations over the next several quarters? Are you sort of implying under certain scenarios maybe that could increase from the Q2 357?
Amber Kramer
Thanks Don for your question. Obviously, we don’t provide guidance on gain on sale going forward. What we’re referring to is seeing that there’s a possibility with the changes that are happening with excess capacity being reduced that they would stabilize, but definitely not saying at this point anything about gain on sale increasing from where it is. But with the changes that are happening in the market right now, we’ll take a few quarters still to pass through gain on sale. We do think that there’s stabilization as we said as supply and demand start to align going forward.
Don Fandetti
Got it. And then on capital management, do you think it makes more sense to buy back stock versus making an acquisition? How do you balance that?
Amber Kramer
We look at all of our options. We definitely want to invest back in the business and increase shareholder value. So we’re constantly looking at what our options are to invest back in the business from recruiting M&A. And while doing so because we’re in a strong capital position we have the ability to increase shareholder value by repurchasing shares as well.
Don Fandetti
Thank you.
Operator
And our next question comes from the line of Rick Shane with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.
Rick Shane
Thanks everyone for taking my questions this afternoon. Amber, I’m going to follow-up on Don’s question about gain on sale. When you say stabilize that just suggests that it’s going to be at some level for a period of time. Can you at least put that in context? Is it stable in the context of second quarter gain on sale? Is that where you see it stabilizing? Stabilizing without any context kind of confuses us.
Amber Kramer
Sure. There’s significant market volatility in Q1, as we know, and in prior years. And in Q2 we did see — we saw the drop quarter-over-quarter. And so, from where we are now, that would be stabilization going forward, is what I would say. And again, that’s dependent on market dynamics, how fast excess capacity is shedding. But we believe from what we’re seeing that — from where we are now that, that could stabilize in the coming quarters.
Rick Shane
Okay. That’s helpful context, just to, sort of, set a level. And it actually dovetails into my next question, which is that, if we think back historically in periods where capacity came out of the industry and we think about 2006 to 2008 and then we think about 2008 to 2010, it feels — it seems like in hindsight, 2006 to 2008 capacity reduction was somewhat gradual and delayed, because rates were moving slowly higher. And then, obviously, there was a huge dislocation with the GFC. Are you seeing that capacity is coming out faster this time, because of the severity of the movement in rates, which really doesn’t have any recent sort of analog?
Amber Kramer
I can speak to what we’re seeing now. And then, Mary Ann or Terry, if you want to talk about 2006 2008. I think with everything, the rates dropping so quickly in the beginning of the year, there was some reaction to the market. And so that everybody is playing catch-up in the industry as a whole. And so, in that sense it would be slower.
And I think because of the excess capital from the two years prior that people have they can hold on and possibly keep additional staff, while getting additional volume, because they have the excess capital to spend. And that’s elongating the process of the excess capacity coming out of the market.
Terry Schmidt
Yes. This is Terry. I mean, in 2008 and 2009, the shift of just the product and the type of business that mortgage companies were doing, there was so much Alt-A that had so quickly dried up. But at the same time, if you were already securitizing with the GSEs and with Ginnie Mae, the margins were going up quite rapidly.
So we’re in such a different marketplace, where most of the products are the GSEs and the Ginnie Mae product and just the rate movement going up so fast. I think, everybody — if you compare it to what was happening in 2018 and 2019, I think companies are actually moving faster to make change than they were then.
Mary Ann McGarry
And I would — this is Mary Anne. And I would just add that, back in 2008 time period, there was a lot more companies that were very levered. They didn’t have a lot of cash to put them — help them sustain through the volatility, where, I think, in 2020 and 2021 there was a lot of equity built up throughout the industry. And so, I think they have a lot more in — for patience through the volatility this time around.
Rick Shane
Okay. That’s helpful context. So, I appreciate it. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Trevor Cranston with JMP Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Trevor Cranston
Hi. Thanks. I missed the details you provided on the new loan product that you rolled out in July. So I was wondering if you could just briefly summarize that again and say, if that’s a GSE-eligible product or if it’s something that would have a different outlet.
And then, a second part of that question, if you could maybe talk about kind of other product areas you might be evaluating going forward. If you guys are looking at anything like, second-lien products, or just any color there would be helpful. Thanks.
Mary Ann McGarry
Sure. I think you were referring to the complete rate program, and — that we recently rolled out. And it’s kind of an alternative to the traditional FICO score, and creates a path for homeownership for — predominantly I mean for first-time homebuyers and the underserved. And yes, it’s GSE-eligible.
And we are also constantly looking at new programs and talking to investors and being creative to bring to the market is something that will help homeownership throughout for all types of homebuyers whether it’s first-time homebuyers or jumbo homebuyers.
So the other thing is that, to answer your question about the HELOCs yes, we’re looking at HELOCs in seconds and outlets for that.
Terry Schmidt
Just another note on complete rate, it is eligible for FHA VA and rural housing. It’s not eligible for Fannie and Freddie. And it’s just a different review not using FICO to qualify the borrower but using a residual income analysis and reviewing their payment history their rent payment history.
Trevor Cranston
Okay. Got it.
Terry Schmidt
And I would say we’re possibly more focused outside of the HELOCs in the second were more focused on trying to figure out programs that help the underserved and the first-time homebuyer. And we’ve got a lot of thoughts about that. And we’re working hard to bring out some additional products there.
Trevor Cranston
Okay. Got it. That’s helpful. And then, on the expense side of things, you had mentioned that you’re trying to use your relative position of strength and remaining profitable as an opportunity to gain market share and hire some talented people.
But as you look at the overall company, are there any areas where you guys have identified that could be potential for kind of saving costs as volumes come down and margins remain tight in the near-term?
Amber Kramer
Yeah. So what we had referred to on the call in our prepared remarks was in the first half of the year we have annualized savings of about $40 million primarily from staff reductions. So, we look at internal metrics and measures to that. And that would be aligned with where volume is the volume that we’re originating and what we’re seeing coming down the pipe.
And that’s with — because of our cost structure it’s primarily from on the staffing side because we don’t have large fixed costs other than staffing. And so we’re always monitoring our internal metrics and looking at that and aligning that with volume and that’s where that cost savings is coming from.
Trevor Cranston
Got it. Okay. I appreciate the comment. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. At this time, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. And I would now like to turn the call back over to Mary Ann McGarry, for any closing remarks.
Mary Ann McGarry
Well, thank you everyone for joining us today. Have a great evening. And we look forward to updating you on the next call. Thank you.
Operator
This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation. And have a great day.
Be the first to comment