The ‘High-High-Low’ Closed-End Fund Report, July 2022

Global connection

piranka

Author’s note: This article was released to CEF/ETF Income Laboratory members on August 2, 2022. Please check the latest data before investing.

“High-High-Low” Closed-End Fund Report

Quantitative screens help to rapidly narrow down attractive candidates from the database of 500+ closed-end funds (CEFs) for further due diligence and investigation. The “High-High-Low” report was inspired by a member of CEF/ETF Income Laboratory, who wrote:

Stanford, you should do a follow-up article on CEF that distribute 8%+, have 90% or more coverage and trade under NAV. What does that look like in today’s world? How many funds are doing that?

What are the Z scores? I think many investors would be interested who are pushing for higher yield to identify best-in-class of aggressive funds that are coming close to covering dividends. Allows people to reevaluate risk/reward.

The “High-High-Low” report, therefore, screens for the following three attributes that we would like to screen for:

  1. High distributions (>6.5%) (i.e., 6.5% or higher yields)
  2. High coverage (>85%) (i.e., 85% or better coverage)
  3. Low premium/discount value (<+5%) (i.e., trading at a +5% premium or less)

Note that the above thresholds are subject to change, based on the number of eligible CEFs there are that satisfy all three of the criteria. I try to aim for a minimum of at least 20 eligible funds so that the “top 10” list actually means something (top 50% of the screen).

As for the Quality CEF report, I should mention some caveats about using coverage as a screen. Firstly, the coverage ratios are calculated using earnings data from CEFConnect. No efforts have been made to independently verify the coverage ratios from the individual fund annual/semi-annual reports themselves. Secondly, having a coverage ratio >90% does not guarantee that the fund’s distribution is secure. Many funds reduce their distributions periodically in line with market conditions in order to maintain good coverage. Thirdly, a coverage cut-off ratio of 90% is, ultimately, an arbitrary number. A fund with 89.9% coverage will be excluded from the rankings, whereas funds with 90.1% coverage will be considered, even though only a sliver of difference separates the two.

The coverage ratio is calculated by dividing the earnings/share number provided by CEFConnect on the “distributions” tab by the distribution/share. CEFData also provides earnings coverage numbers as well.

I should also note that having both high yields and less than 100% coverage (though greater than 80%) makes this a more aggressive screen compared to the Quality report (which only selects for >100% coverage). Furthermore, note that because the universe of eligible funds is pretty small, some of the CEFs will appear in multiple top lists, just in a different order…

I hope that these rankings of “high-high-low” CEFs will provide fertile grounds for further exploration.

Key to table headings:

P/D = premium/discount

Z = 1-year z-score

Cov = coverage

1Y NAV = 1-year NAV total return

Lev = leverage

BE = baseline expense

Data were taken from the close of July 29, 2022.

1. Top 10 widest “high-high-low” discounts

The following data show the 10 CEFs with the widest discounts, yield >6.5% and coverage >85%. Z-scores, leverage and baseline expense are shown for comparison.

Fund Ticker Category P/D Yield Z Cov 1Y NAV Lev BE
Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fd (HFRO) Senior Loans -25.81% 8.11% -1.5 116% 18.1% 11% 1.61%
Principal Real Estate Income Fund (PGZ) Real Estate -13.06% 9.58% -0.4 100% -9.2% 33% 2.15%
Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund (IVH) High Yield -11.35% 7.99% -1.0 110% -17.6% 30% 1.51%
Nuveen Real Asset Inc and Grwt (JRI) Global Allocation -11.06% 8.35% -0.6 86% -8.3% 32% 1.47%
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield (BGH) High Yield -10.86% 9.45% -1.0 122% -13.0% 30% 1.62%
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income (BGX) Senior Loans -10.49% 7.88% -0.9 112% -10.2% 41% 2.43%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (DHF) High Yield -10.43% 9.27% -0.9 103% -19.8% 33% 1.28%
Templeton Emerg Mkts Income (TEI) Emerging Market Income -9.89% 12.21% -1.0 92% -23.0% 12% 1.22%
KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) High Yield -9.60% 10.39% -1.0 106% -16.7% 42% 1.32%
Blackstone Strategic Credit (BGB) Senior Loans -9.47% 6.89% -0.7 108% -9.8% 39% 1.32%

Chart

Income Lab

2. Top 10 lowest “high-high-low” z-scores

The following data show the 10 CEFs with the lowest z-scores, yield >6.5%, coverage >85% and premium/discount <+5%. Leverage and baseline expense are shown for comparison.

Fund Ticker Category Z P/D Yield Cov 1Y NAV Lev BE
Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fd (HFRO) Senior Loans -1.5 -25.81% 8.11% 116% 18.1% 11% 1.61%
BNY Mellon Alcentra Gl Crd Inc 2024 Tgt (DCF) Multisector Income -1.2 -5.42% 8.10% 88% -15.0% 33% 1.65%
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate Term (BSL) Senior Loans -1.1 -7.33% 6.56% 108% -7.8% 35% 1.32%
Western Asset Premier Bond (WEA) Investment Grade -1.1 -8.03% 7.17% 110% -18.2% 33% 0.94%
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield (BGH) High Yield -1.0 -10.86% 9.45% 122% -13.0% 30% 1.62%
Flah & Crum Dynamic Pref & Income Fund (DFP) Preferreds -1.0 -0.06% 8.00% 117% -16.2% 37% 1.06%
KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) High Yield -1.0 -9.60% 10.39% 106% -16.7% 42% 2.12%
Western Asset High Yield Defined Opps (HYI) High Yield -1.0 -5.21% 9.09% 85% -14.7% 0% 0.93%
PIMCO High Income (PHK) Multisector Income -1.0 4.92% 11.23% 91% -11.2% 34% 0.86%
Templeton Emerg Mkts Income (TEI) Emerging Market Income -1.0 -9.89% 12.21% 92% -23.0% 12% 1.22%

Chart

Income Lab

3. Top 10 highest “high-high-low” yields

The following data show the 10 CEFs with the highest yields, coverage >85% and premium/discount <+5%. z-scores, leverage, and baseline expense are shown for comparison.

Fund Ticker Category Yield P/D Z Cov 1Y NAV Lev BE
Templeton Emerg Mkts Income (TEI) Emerging Market Income 12.21% -9.89% -1.0 92% -23.0% 12% 0.88%
Pioneer Diversified High Income (HNW) High Yield 11.67% -7.87% -0.8 96% -16.1% 35% 1.58%
PIMCO High Income (PHK) Multisector Income 11.23% 4.92% -1.0 91% -11.2% 34% 0.86%
RiverNorth Specialty Finance (RSF) High Yield 11.15% -0.31% 0.9 172% -1.0% 37% 6.53%
Western Asset High Income II (HIX) High Yield 10.99% -1.27% -0.1 91% -22.5% 33% 1.27%
Western Asset Global High Income (EHI) High Yield 10.68% -7.35% -0.6 103% -22.5% 37% 1.37%
Pioneer High Income (PHT) High Yield 10.45% -8.50% -0.8 107% -15.4% 34% 1.14%
Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt (EMD) Emerging Market Income 10.43% -8.87% -0.1 101% -26.9% 36% 1.30%
KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) High Yield 10.39% -9.60% -1.0 106% -16.7% 42% 1.32%
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) Global Income 10.38% -4.33% 0.6 116% -22.3% 32% 1.50%

Chart

Income Lab

4. Top 10 best combination of “high-high-low” yield and discount

For possible buy candidates, it is probably a good idea to consider both yield and discount. Buying a CEF with both a high yield and discount not only gives you the opportunity to capitalize from discount contraction, but you also get “free” alpha as a result of the distribution being paid out. This is because paying out a distribution is effectively the same as liquidating part of the fund at NAV and returning the capital to the unitholders. I considered several ways to rank CEFs by a composite metric of both yield and discount. The simplest would be yield + discount, however, I disregarded this because yields and discounts may have different ranges of absolute values and a sum would be biased towards the larger set of values. I finally settled on the multiplicative product, yield x discount. This is because I consider a CEF with 7% yield and 7% discount to be more desirable than a fund with 2% yield and 12% discount, or 12% yield and 2% discount, even though each pair of quantities sum to 14%. Multiplying yield and discount together biases towards funds with both high yield and discount. Since discount is negative and yield is positive, the more negative the “DxY” metric, the better. Only funds with >6.5% yield, >85% coverage and <+5% premium/discount are considered.

Fund Ticker Category P/D Yield Z DxY Cov 1Y NAV Lev BE
Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fd (HFRO) Senior Loans -25.81% 8.11% -1.5 -2.09 116% 18.1% 11% 1.61%
Principal Real Estate Income Fund (PGZ) Real Estate -13.06% 9.58% -0.4 -1.25 100% -9.2% 33% 2.15%
Templeton Emerg Mkts Income (TEI) Emerging Market Income -9.89% 12.21% -1.0 -1.21 92% -23.0% 12% 1.47%
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield (BGH) High Yield -10.86% 9.45% -1.0 -1.03 122% -13.0% 30% 1.62%
KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) High Yield -9.60% 10.39% -1.0 -1.00 106% -16.7% 42% 2.12%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (DHF) High Yield -10.43% 9.27% -0.9 -0.97 103% -19.8% 33% 1.28%
Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt (EMD) Emerging Market Income -8.87% 10.43% -0.1 -0.93 101% -26.9% 36% 1.30%
Nuveen Real Asset Inc and Grwt (JRI) Global Allocation -11.06% 8.35% -0.6 -0.92 86% -8.3% 32% 1.32%
Pioneer Diversified High Income (HNW) High Yield -7.87% 11.67% -0.8 -0.92 96% -16.1% 35% 0.88%
Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund (IVH) High Yield -11.35% 7.99% -1.0 -0.91 110% -17.6% 30% 1.51%

Chart

Income Lab

5. Top 10 best combination of “high-high-low” yield, discount and z-score

This is my favorite metric because it takes into account all three factors that I always consider when buying or selling CEFs: yield, discount and z-score. The composite metric simply multiplies the three quantities together. As both discount and z-score are negative while yield is positive, the more positive the “DxYxZ” metric, the better. Only funds with >7% yield, >85% coverage and <+5% premium/discount are considered.

Fund Ticker Category P/D Yield Z DxYxZ Cov 1Y NAV Lev BE
Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fd (HFRO) Senior Loans -25.81% 8.11% -1.5 3.12 116% 18.1% 11% 1.32%
Templeton Emerg Mkts Income (TEI) Emerging Market Income -9.89% 12.21% -1.0 1.17 92% -23.0% 12% 1.22%
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield (BGH) High Yield -10.86% 9.45% -1.0 1.06 122% -13.0% 30% 1.47%
KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) High Yield -9.60% 10.39% -1.0 0.98 106% -16.7% 42% 2.12%
Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund (IVH) High Yield -11.35% 7.99% -1.0 0.88 110% -17.6% 30% 1.51%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (DHF) High Yield -10.43% 9.27% -0.9 0.84 103% -19.8% 33% 1.87%
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income (BGX) Senior Loans -10.49% 7.88% -0.9 0.75 112% -10.2% 41% 2.06%
Pioneer Diversified High Income (HNW) High Yield -7.87% 11.67% -0.8 0.73 96% -16.1% 35% 1.58%
Pioneer High Income (PHT) High Yield -8.50% 10.45% -0.8 0.72 107% -15.4% 34% 1.14%
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (PHD) Senior Loans -9.10% 7.81% -0.9 0.62 86% -9.2% 36% 1.88%

Chart

Income Lab

Strategy Statement

Our goal at the CEF/ETF Income Laboratory is to provide consistent income with enhanced total returns. We achieve this by:

  1. Identifying the most profitable CEF and ETF opportunities.
  2. Avoiding mismanaged or overpriced funds that can sink your portfolio.
  3. Employing our unique CEF rotation strategy to double compound your income.

It’s the combination of these factors that has allowed our Income Generator portfolio to massively outperform our fund-of-CEFs benchmark ETF (YYY) whilst providing growing income, too (approx. 10% CAGR).

Chart

Income Lab

Remember, it’s really easy to put together a high-yielding CEF portfolio, but to do so profitably is another matter!

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*