New York Times loses an appeal in Project Veritas case By Reuters

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The New York Times building is seen in Manhattan, New York, U.S., August 3, 2020. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A New York appeals court judge has rejected the New York Times’ request to lift an order temporarily blocking it from publishing or seeking various documents related to the conservative activist group Project Veritas.

Friday’s order from Justice Leonard Austin of the state Appellate Division in Brooklyn means the Times cannot use the documents, which Project Veritas said are protected by attorney-client privilege, until a Nov. 23 hearing on whether to extend the prohibition.

The Times had been appealing a Thursday order by a trial judge, Justice Charles Wood of the Westchester County Supreme Court, that the newspaper called an unconstitutional prior restraint, a view shared by some First Amendment advocates.

“Today’s decision to allow the injunction is deeply disappointing,” Times spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha said in an email. “We look forward to explaining our position in court.”

Project Veritas did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Wood’s order was part of Project Veritas’ defamation lawsuit against the Times over a September 2020 article describing a video the group released alleging voter fraud in Minnesota.

It followed a Nov. 11 Times article discussing Project Veritas’ journalism practices, and a U.S. Department of Justice probe into the group’s possible role in the reported theft of a diary from President Joe Biden’s daughter Ashley.

That article discussed memos by Benjamin Barr, a lawyer for Project Veritas. The group has said those memos were privileged, and the Times wrote about them to harm and embarrass a litigation adversary.

Wood’s order blocks the Times from reporting on or trying to obtain privileged Project Veritas materials until the Nov. 23 hearing.

The judge will also consider whether the newspaper must remove references to Barr’s memos from the Nov. 11 article.

The Times has said Wood’s order ran afoul of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1971 decision rejecting the Nixon administration’s bid to halt publication of the Pentagon Papers, which described U.S. military involvement in Vietnam.

The case is Project Veritas v New York Times Co et al, New York State Supreme Court, Westchester County, No. 63921/2020.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*